.
Feedback

Developers Unveil More Modest Vision for Old Anchor Glass Factory

Described as the "pre-preliminary plan", Somerset Developers showed the Aberdeen Planning Board their updated vision for the approximately 51 acre property

Somerset Developers presented their latest design concept for a mixed use community at the location of the old Anchor Glass Factory during the Aberdeen Township Planning Board meeting Wednesday night.

The purpose of the presentation was to show Aberdeen their ideas for the property. They described the concept as a "pre-preliminary plan," noting that they still have to meet with township engineers and planners to fine tune the details before seeking approval from the planning board.

Raphael Zucker, the president of Somerset Developers, explained that the company was selected by the property owner to represent them in 2004. By 2006, redevelopment plans for the industrial area were extensive and involved creating hundreds of residential units, large commercial stores, and a new Garden State Parkway entrance and exit.

According to Zucker, the 2012 design concept is much more modest in comparison to plans developed in 2006 and even those developed in 2010.

"We scaled back some of the ambitions we had," Zucker said. "Way back when we had the intention of coming in and saying 600,000 square foot retail community and approximately 700 to 800 residential units with its own on and off ramp to the Garden State Parkway. We were going to have a park and ride facility, a 1,000 car parking garage, on and on and on. Large dreams, big dreams that were cautiously embraced, I would say, by this municipality. But those dreams did not get past the Turnpike Authority."

Zucker explained that the Turnpike Authority required extensive reworking of the grounds to create an on and off ramp, and the project would have cost "tens of millions of dollars."

Somerset was also unsuccessful in acquiring a piece of property on Cliffwood Avenue, where they originally intended to put an entrance and exit to the development for local residents.

In response to these setbacks, Somerset Developers abandoned the idea of a Parkway entrance and moved the Cliffwood Road entrance and exit slightly. This in turn caused them to reduce the proposed amount of residential units and commercial property and forgo the idea of a park and ride in an effort to mitigate increased traffic in the area.

"What you have here is a true mixed use, live, work, play, people centric community that we're extremely proud to put here," he said.

The entrance and exit to the property would still be located on Cliffwood Avenue, but would be closer to the Parkway overpass than previously planned, according to a design rendering (the rendering is attached to this article in the photo gallery). That road would be called Main Street, and would be the location of the commercial property and several multi-family units above the retail stores.

Continuing down Main Street, there would be a traffic circle allowing a motorist to turn around and look for on-street parking or to travel along Main Street to Glassworks Park. Glassworks Park would be located where the factory is right now, and Somerset said they plan to preserve three smoke stacks and make the rest of the space open for passive recreation.

Behind the commercial property on Main Street near the Cliffwood Road entrance would be a large parking lot, where the majority of shoppers would park, explained Planner Robert Goodill, of Tort Gallas and Partners, Inc. According to Goodill, by keeping the majority of the parking out of sight and off of Main Street, shoppers will be more likely to visit the retail area and foot traffic will dominate the road.

"You make streets that are pedestrian friendly. Streets were the automobile is not the king," Goodill said.

Just over 15% of the area would be commercial. Somerset envisions a small movie theater and other smaller retail businesses versus the larger box stores, Goodill said.

The concept plan also includes between 500 residential units, 110 of which would be one, two, or three bedroom affordable housing units. One hundred ninety of the units would be townhouses for sale, 65 with an integral garage and 129 with a detached garage. There would be 56 townhouses and 129 apartments available, in addition to 16 multi-family units above retail.

"We're creating a community that is seamless; providing a renter with a feeling of home ownership. Rather than forcing everyone who needs to rent into a large monolithic building that's pretty typical for rental communities, a lot of what you see here looks like townhouses," said Zucker. "It provides an entry level into the market place for someone who needs homeownership but because of today's economy is unable to do that."

Goodill explained that 17.5% of the redeveloped property would be open space, including Glassworks Park, small pocket parks throughout the residential area, and a fitness trail running around the perimeter of the development. They also plan to have rain gardens to help with rain water and storm drain management.

Aside from green open space, they also intend to have several "hardscapes" along Main Street that would allow for benches, tables or a gazebo. An outdoor place designed to allow pedestrians to enjoy a cup of coffee or sit with friends, Goodill explained.

"This is a rich and inviting neighborhood to walk around in, with gorgeous streetscapes," Goodill said of the concept design.

What do you think of Somerset's vision? What else would you like to see included if this development is approved?

aberdeen mom June 22, 2012 at 03:10 pm
How will our school system handle more children? I don't see how more residential development helps improve our town.
JosephGhabourLaw June 22, 2012 at 04:32 pm
Well the zoning of the property, developer plans, etc. are one matter. However "Abderdeen" mom brings up another issue: how do the children there get to school, how do adults walk or bike for exercise? Are there bikelanes in the project or adequate faculties to cross main -- or simply pedal to school?
debra June 22, 2012 at 04:37 pm
god i hope this falls through.. we dont need this.the schools wont be able to handle it,then they will have to build more schools,more teachers, increase taxes.. lets just knock it down and make green space,no more empty office builidings either.
Chelsea Naso (Editor) June 22, 2012 at 05:31 pm
The actual construction, if the plan were approved, would be very far off. But for exercise, there is a fitness trail around the perimeter and there would be Glassworks Park.
Not sure how the developer would address the issue of an increase in children, though. There is definitely still a lot of thinking that needs to go into this plan.
Cliff June 22, 2012 at 07:22 pm
HOO-RAY, I've always wanted to live right near some dangerous old industrial smokestacks. My guess is that it is too expensive to remove them due to hazardous substances and environmental contamination, so let's just leave them for kids to play around (CHEAPER). Watch out for those pesky earthquakes! Can they recycles the asbestos from the building and insulate my air ducts with it too?
Are we really letting these stupid people, who actually thought they would get a full Parkway Interchange so close to 120, design another dumb idea? Let's just put in a high rise or three, we'll call it Smokestack Towers! Now here is the best idea, get a glass company back in there and create some jobs for more than one season.
lauren giermanski June 22, 2012 at 09:33 pm
oh geez I tell you the second I can afford it i'm moving out of this town. they can't really approve this can they?
Teresa June 23, 2012 at 12:21 am
Green acres, a park even a spray park or town swim club for the locals would even be a good idea. Our schools are at capacity as is... This is a bad idea!!! The area cannot handle that many cars or people and I'm sure the residents who live nearby don't want anymore traffic around. Hey bring back a drive in theater that be fun! A 500+ residential complex in this market... Laughable... Knock it down and grow some grass!!!!!
Norma Jean Savitsky June 27, 2012 at 01:21 pm
The traffic is already congested enough, on Cliffwood Ave. This development means more people, more schools, more teachers and MORE TAXES. No one wants a standing reminder of that black bellowing smoke coming from those stacks. How about a reminder of the agricultural origins of this neighborhood, that was once farm land, long before that metal monster was built in the early 60's. The charm of this area was it's ruralness, but it seems newcomers aren't going to be satisfied until ever last inch natural habitat is built on and this area's history is gone forever. Why not include preserving and restoring the old "Zudniak Home" as a centerpiece of this plan? The architectural & historic beauty of this building with its slate roof and old charm would leave at least some remnant of our farming history.
JosephGhabourLaw June 27, 2012 at 01:53 pm
Chelsea:
A "fitness trail around the perimeter" isn't an alternative way to get about. Most of New Jersey fails the "Popsicle test", which part of why we have a very unhealthy population, and many people leaving NJ. "If an 8-year-old kid can safely go somewhere to buy a popsicle, and get back home before it melts, chances are it's a neighborhood that works." http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/08/the-popsicle-and-halloween-tests-what-makes-a-place-livable/244021/
Chelsea Naso (Editor) June 27, 2012 at 02:19 pm
Sorry Joseph. In your previous comment you referenced exercise, so I was just highlighting the aspects of the plan that would allow for adults and children to exercise.
For getting about, the developers envision streets that are pedestrian dominated with wide sidewalks and such. One said that it would be about a five minute walk from the far corner of the residential area to main street. Someone who wishes to take a bus or train would have to either walk, bike or drive to a bus stop or the train station. And I know from jogging in the area that Cliffwood Road is not very pedestrian friendly. The developers definitely still have a lot of planning to do before bringing this before the planning board.
ginnie tune mendes June 27, 2012 at 04:13 pm
attend the public meetings and voice yourselves,,,,i also agree, with the job plan...my God isnt there enuff living space in Aberdeen already...we need jobs...
JosephGhabourLaw July 3, 2012 at 01:32 pm
Sorry, the Patch didn't sent me a notice, although I should be following this. Bottom line is that we need NJ to be more walk and bicycle friendly, both for fitness, and to cut the traffic on the roads for all of us.
Norma Jean Savitsky April 16, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Let's see if in the end, the final plan does contain parks. We were promised a park with the last major build of a 52 house development & got 2 extra houses squeezed in & NO park.
Norma Jean Savitsky April 16, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Cliffwood Avenue "CANNOT" take 700 hundred more vehicles, between the train traffic & the parkway rush hour, morning & evening traffic is already horrendous! Go back to the city if you want to live right on top of each other & spend the day sitting in traffic. Don't try to turn Cliffwood into NY. All these politicians seem to see is tax revenue, which they will overspend & raise taxes again & again. Before they brought in American Can Co. we were told it would lower our property taxes, but they've gone up ever since.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Matawan-Aberdeen Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Peggy Devlin Blazewicz June 18, 2013 at 07:29 am
FUSE members include men and women. In fact, I've seen great articles written by men. Thank youRead More Wendy!
Allen Kuhn June 13, 2013 at 01:00 pm
In Matawan-Aberdeen Patch there is no date for the instalation dinner and the phone # for Linda isRead More not in service. Allen Kuhn - Right at home
Linda June 13, 2013 at 03:08 pm
The date for the installation is Tuesday, June 18th. Linda's correct phone number is 732-290-1125Read More Sorry for any confusion