patching...
Update: Get Matawan and Aberdeen news in your inbox -- sign up for the Matawan-Aberdeen Patch newsletter »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATED: Christie Calls for Tax Cuts, Education Reform

New Jersey governor discussed his priorities in annual State of the State address.

 

Governor Christie called for a 10 percent cut in state income taxes and mapped out a comprehensive education and pension reform plan in his second annual State of the State Address Tuesday. 

Making several references to a "New Jersey Comeback," the Republican governor claimed the state has turned a corner from the "dark days of 2010" and touted some of his accomplishments: capping property tax increases, lowering the unemployment rate and scaling back benefits for public workers.

"I will not permit anyone to re-impose the tax raising, overspending, irresponsible ways of our past which led to our dark decade of joblessness in New Jersey," Christie told the senate and assembly members gathered in the Statehouse. 

"Stand strong with me and I will stand up for you.  We are going in the right direction," he said.

Christie began his 40-minute address with a moment of silence for Assemblyman Alex DeCroce, whose untimely death last week prompted the governor to postpone the State of the State in order to mourn his longtime friend and mentor. 

In the coming year, Christie said he would fulfill a promise he made in 2009, that "every New Jerseyan" regardless of income, will see a cut in taxes. The governor said the state is in competition with other countries and other states to bring jobs to its residents.

The tax cuts would enable New Jersey to draw a contrast with neighboring states that have raised income tax rates in recent years.

"In this environment, the best way to compete is to show a different direction.  Let others choose tax increases.  We choose responsible tax cuts to give our overburdened citizens real relief and to help New Jersey grow," he said. 

Christie also called for statewide reform of the education system, including tying objective measurements to tenure, allowing districts to remove its least effective teachers ahead of more junior staff members in the event of layoffs, and giving higher salaries to teachers in failing districts.

He also called for reforming the state's process for authorizing new charter schools and establishing tax credits for low-income students in the state's worst-performing schools.

"These are not radical reforms; they are common sense. They are not rash; they are long overdue. And they are not luxuries which can afford to languish for another six months or another year; they are essential for New Jersey’s success," he said.

The governor credited the legislature with helping the administration reach its goals for the state, peppering the phrase "Jersey strong" throughout his speech.

"Our economy suffers while Washington politicians – in both parties – fiddle. America’s position of strength and leadership around the world deteriorates while our leaders bicker and blame. Over the last two years New Jersey did the exact opposite.  We achieved results because we did it together," Christie said.

Among the steps he proposed to improve the quality of life in New Jersey, Christie said reclaiming the state's inner cities was key. He showcased a bail reform proposal by pointing to a guest sitting in the front row of the balcony in the packed Assembly chamber — Newark woman Cassandra Dock — who approached the governor at a Union City town hall meeting last year and asked him to help reduce violence on Newark's city streets. 

Though he was light on specifics, Christie said laws should change to allow judges to weigh a defendant's potential threat to the community when determining bail. The governor also proposed mandatory substance abuse treatment for non-violent offenders with addiction problems.

"It will send a clear message to those who have fallen victim to the disease of drug abuse – we want to help you, not throw you away.  We will require you to get treatment. Your life has value.  Every one of God’s creations can be redeemed.  Everyone deserves a second chance," Christie said.

Christie ended his address by reiterating that the state is better off now than it was two years ago, before he took office.

"We have climbed out of the hole that was left to us – together.  Now it is time to raise the great flag of the State of New Jersey as high as we can – together."

He closed with a quote from Martin Luther King Jr. that touted a message of unity.

"We may have come on different ships, but we’re in the same boat now," he said.

Read the full text of Christie's speech here

Related Topics: Christie State of the State and gov. christie

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

7:48 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Easy for you to say, "Oscar" ;-) (wink, wink.)

Comment_arrow

Ann Brucato

8:31 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012

I am amazed at the stupidty of people who don't care how much the entire cost of living goes up or how much of the gutting of our society goes on... just keep gutting everything until we no longer have a society we can call civilized. Simplistically stupid if yu ask me. You might have your house but everything around you will be in ashes. When that happens don't wonder why.

bayway mike

5:18 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

10 % tax cut, so how will the local communities make up the difference when they are asking for help from the state?? More layoffs, less services the list is endless!! Unless you happen to live in one of those urban blighted (get out your dictionary) towns!! Hey folks, it isn't going to get any better!! Some of us are trapped in the Garden State with the exit fee when someone decides to retire to another state..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bill Bondar

5:27 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

The way the bridges are set up, we even have to pay to get the hell out of the state.
Pennsylvanians get to come to New Jersey for free. The irony of it all.

Comment_arrow

Joshua Berry

6:37 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Bill: paying to leave NJ is one of the oldest jokes but there is a very valid reason for it. Originally the Delaware River bridges had two-way tolls. As a cost saving measure the transportation agencies for the various bridges decided to collect one way one and double the toll, a mostly revenue neutral proposal.

When deciding which way to toll, they looked at the congestion in Philly and (at the time) more open roads on NJ and decided it was better for traffic to back up on the Jersey side. An actual common-sense solution but it does provide some good jokes :o)

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

7:50 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Bill, you're right, in a sense, they get to come here for free but they must pay to leave if that is possible...I heard you can check out but you can never leave;-) Num-sane?

Comment_arrow

Tim Durkin

9:15 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The exit tax is fully refundable once you file your state tax return for that year. It is in place to insure you file your state taxes. I don't like it, but it is refundable.

Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

9:24 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Sorry also medical expense but not for personal travel

Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

9:25 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Tim, are you speaking of refund of tolls as it relates to business or work expenses? It's not a deduction that can be taken for personal reasons.

Comment_arrow

Thomas

11:10 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

"Will the last one to leave New Jersey, please turn out the lights"
Jim Gearhart (not sure if he originated the quote)
This has been a long-standing joke. It describes the phenomenon that has been happening in New Jersey for a long time. The tax system in this State is disproportionately hard on the middle class and even more so the working poor. The property tax system needs to be replaced. However, we should not do this until we fix the financial problem that is education. Education reform is the key to the whole crisis. Let us not make the mistake to let this be characterized as an attack on teachers; it is indeed a noble profession. We need to put the blame for the out of control costs and the substandard results squarely on the system itself. The system is overloaded with government at every level. What we need to do is to block grant every child, empowering parents to make the decision on where to send their child to school. Schools then compete for the students, offering the most creative and effective schooling for the lowest cost possible. Good old American competition. I have news for you; Teachers will be happier as well. They might have to trade in their pensions for a 401k match, but their day to day job will be more satisfying. They will no longer be stuck teaching in a broken system. I think most would take that trade. Not to mention they will no longer have to belong to a Te@chers Uni@n shhhh… someone might be watching…

Comment_arrow

Tim Durkin

2:06 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

No Paula, I am speaking of the "exit tax" you are charged at settlement. It is a 1% fee based on the sale price of your home when you are moving out of the state of New Jersey. It is in place to insure that you file and pay you required state taxes. If you owe state tax it goes toward the balance due, if you do not owe taxes you are sent a full refund of the fee.

Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

3:31 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Tim, sorry we were talking about 2 different things. Believe it or not, the nonresident seller fee (if you are leaving the state after sale) is actually 2 percent of the consideration price. And you're right; it forces a nonresident seller to file their state return in order to get a full or partial refund if the tax is less than the 2 percent they paid. Otherwise, the state keeps the money. Same principle for creation of the Partnership tax for nonresident partners; partnership must pay on behalf of nonresident partners' share of income and nonresident partners must file returns to get any refund of tax paid. Makes sense to force compliance for those not living in NJ.

Comment_arrow

Stan Walker

5:12 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012

Typical far-left winged democrat candor!!

Thomas Scarano

5:48 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

The Governor coninues to do a great job......

Reply
Comment_arrow

bayway mike

9:29 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Typical far-right winged republican candor!!
CC will be a one-and-done governor in NJ..
He's a bully, especially when he shouts down citizens
at these townhall meetings..

Comment_arrow

.

10:59 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

@Bayway Mike.. As far as I am concerned, he is done already. Low class and a loud mouth is all that he is.

Comment_arrow

Curt Fell

4:29 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

At cleaning off the Buffet line????

Cindy Lu

7:54 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Until you stop the politics everywhere, nothing will change!! There is so much dirty politics that going on. Students are violated by role models in an Authority position every day and they have no choice and neither does the parent who complains. It is happening in all the schools including the exceptional schools. It is all a bunch of baloney. I do not care how many reforms you have in, if you have school officials who are going to lie and cheat all involved with the exception of their own home grown.

Reply

JB

8:33 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

The tax cuts will be paid with all the extra money coming from the tolls Christie just raised 50%! Yes he raised them. Corzine is no longer our governor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Schu

10:27 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Wrong, the 50% increase in tolls was the second part of Corzine's plan not Christie. Get the facts first instead of believing what you hear.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/12/parkway_turnpike_commuters_bra.html

Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

9:09 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Schu,
Are you telling me an in the seat governor can't take action to revise or eradicate a previous governor's toll increase? Our governor just proposed a ten percent income tax cut in the budget; those tax rates were created under another administration. How is cutting the toll increase of a previous administration any different?

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

9:20 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Come on, Schu, don't be a spoilsport. Too much attention to detail makes it all work here and no play here. How will anybody successfully argue their agenda trying to follow rules like that? I think of a line from a 5th Dimension song that best epitomizes how the facts are used to make points by some on this blog..."When the moon is in the seventh house, and Jupiter aligns with Mars..."

Comment_arrow

Stan Walker

5:13 pm on Sunday, January 22, 2012

. . . and George Bush is no longer our President.

Winston

9:03 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Corzine isn't? Oh thats right...he is under investigation for stealing a few billion dollars.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

9:18 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

He didn't steal it, he just can't find it and mysteriously doesn't know what happened to it. Totally understandable, I mean, I always misplace millions of dollars, don't you?

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

9:29 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Winston, his excuse is that he was so clueless and negligent that he simply lost it and cannot find it.

Sadly, I find that completely plausible. Stop voting in Wall Street Blue Blood Trust Fund Babies. They aren't used to being held to high standards, and are sloppy because they've never faced real-world consequences for their failures. Like Romney. Like Jeff Lurie. Like Corzine.

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

9:36 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I know facts are sometimes a little bit too much attention to detail, as I outlined above, Porterincollingswood, but Romney never worked on Wall Street. I do agree, however, that one should never let something as inconsequential as a fact stand in the way of making one's point.

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

10:10 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Neither did Lurie, Paul. He owns a football team. Lighten up...

Comment_arrow

Schu

1:21 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

$1.2 Billion. I lose that amount all the time and it's no big deal.

Ken

9:59 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012

I still want to know what kind of pay cut the governor took? Also were his benefits reduced or does he need to pay more into them? He did it to the public employees, well what about him and ALL NJ politicans taking a pay cut and paying more into their benefits?

Reply

Sal

3:55 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

IF (Big IF) the sate ever has excess funds__-they should be used to pay down the State's debt___not used for tax cuts. WE got into this mess because Whitman wanted to give away money to get votes, so she began the Homestead Rebate program and the State has been in debt ever since then. Paying Down debt should be Christi's main concern.

Reply

Sal

5:11 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The toll increase that Christie ALLOWED to go into effect did more to HURT NJ and make it LESS attractive as a State to do Business in. Why Mr. Christie should any business locate their business in NJ and pay high these tolls to use the major roads when there are no tolls in NC or SC??? High NJ Turnpike tolls only serve to make NJ less attractive also Mr. Christie.

Reply

john cohn

5:46 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

roads bridges are almost the worst if not the worst in the nation even town roads but thats ok NJ is on its way back .Fat GUY in a little coat is out of his tree . i think of him when i hit my next pot hole and when i get a great big extra $80.00 back from my income tax while the millionaire gets back thousands ... come on election day !!!

Reply

1stcav

7:31 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

To all who use these toll roads and now raised tolls of 50 % , we thank you for the donations..Yes , because of you hard working, forced to take these roads as you have no choice , CC is going to give ALL a 10 % DECREASE on NJ State taxes.....so few who do for so many the top 1 % won't thank you , we the 99 % will...Thank you ..NUTS !

Reply

Bob English

8:01 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I would like my taxes cut as much as the next person but the fact is that for families making 50k-100k/year, the proposed cut would not amount to much ($50-$100) while those making over $1 million/year would see a hug cut in the dollar amount of their taxes. I'd rather see the State pay more of its current pension obligations now (nothing contributed during the govs first year and only 1/6 of the required amount in his second year) than keep kicking that can down the road and leave future taxpayers stuck with our bills.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas A. Blasi

9:26 am on Friday, January 20, 2012

I agree with Bob English 100%.

Shore Skeptic

8:28 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Well people...YOU kept voting democrats in year after year and letting unions ride roughshod over us, so now its time to reap what you sow. Stop acting like crack addicts being weened off a several-decade long high and open your eyes.

Reply

dajoepa75

8:59 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

To visit my daughter and son-in-law in Staten Island takes 1 hour 15 minute ride and now costs 20.70 in tolls alone. I see little advancement on the construction activity on the tpke additions at exit 7-7a and I travel different times of the day although the backup continues. The roads on NJ side to the bridge are a nitemare. According to NJ.com, a 3 percent drop in use of turnpike in first 5 days of new year (although more of drop was predicted). I know Corzine put this increase into effect; but I can't believe that a current inseat governor can't take some action. $21.00 to drive 42 miles on paid highway/bridges and I don't have to pay this everyday like those who commute to and from NY to NJ. Yet, the Tacony Palmyra bridge into Phila is $2.00. $12.00 to SI and 2.00 to Phila?

Reply

Helen

9:07 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The legislature has been controlled by who for how many years now???? Democrats! The Governor, D or R, is not solely responsible for the financial mess NJ is in. How about saving money by not providing services to Illegals and holding businesses accountable for hiring them? Why do we provide fee healthcare to them? All the costs are passed down to LEGAL residents (citizens) through higher health insurance premiums, taxes etc. They're out buying filet mignon while we're clipping coupons. Yes, keep on voting the Dems into the legislature and keep perpetuating the welfare state!

Reply

Helen

9:16 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

(USA) 1/12 - GLOBAL INTERNET VOTING FIRM BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM - By Bev Harris
Permission to reprint granted, with link to http://www.blackboxvoting.org

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format. As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

Reply

Helen

9:17 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won't work (if SCYTL's voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own "audit" by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

Reply

Helen

9:17 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.

SCYTL is moving into or already running elections in: the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia.

SCYTL is based in Barcelona; its funding comes from international venture capital funds including Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.

Here is the link to the press release regarding SYCTL's acquisition of SOE:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/scytl-acquires-soe-software-becoming-the-leadin g-election-software-provider-2012-01-11

quote:"In 2007...the top 250 companies in the world had sales in excess of $14.7 trillion...an amount exceeding the GDP [Gross Domestic Product] of the United States or the European Union, $13.2 trillion and $13.7 trillion, respectively...combined sales of the top five (Wal-Mart, Exxon-Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP and General Motors) was nearly $1.5 trillion -- larger than the GDP of all but seven countries." -- Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making, by David Rothkopf

Reply

Paul J. DiBartolo

9:31 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Apparently the NJ public school system has not done its job correctly because nobody seems to understand the concept of the income tax. Allow me to simplify, the more you make the more you pay (BTW, that's a simple fact of percentages). Inversely, when you reduce the amount charged the less you pay the smaller the percentage of what you get back. The problem here is everybody wants somebody else to pay their share that's why our income tax becomes progressive and then you end up with wealth flight. Hey, the median income for teachers in NJ with benefits is at about $100,000/year and yet nobody seems to be able to put 2 and 2 together when it comes to income taxes.
Tax Question: with 47% of wage earners paying no federal income tax, who then IS carrying the federal income tax burden?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

10:15 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Tax Answer: 47% of wage earners are paying no federal income tax, in large part because of tax cuts that were put in place under the last 2 Presidents. We have historically low tax rates in this country for this category of tax - at all levels of income. So this is what you get.

So you are calling for a middle class tax increase I suppose?

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

10:17 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

"...who then IS carrying the federal income tax burden?"

Chinese banks.

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

11:00 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

PS - it is 46% of "households" or "return filers". Not all of whom are "wage earners".

I do agree, however, that one should never let something as inconsequential as a fact stand in the way of making one's point.

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

11:18 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Porter, we don't have a funding problem we have a spending problem. Get rid of all the tax loopholes and go to a flat tax. Allow everyone to get some skin in the game. We have people voting and making decisions about how much money should be collected from others and how it should then be spent when they have contributed nothing. "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not" (Thomas Jefferson). The end is near!

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

11:21 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@Porter - PS - it is 46% of "households" or "return filers". Not all of whom are "wage earners".

Everything I've ever read on it implies that it is 47% of wager earners. Now, wage earners tend to have households which is ultimately what earns them the ability to pay nothing, so...

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

11:41 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Paul, I was just answering the question and busting your chops a bit. You have historically low taxes, all-time high credits (kids, stimulus, etc) and escalating non-taxable payments like medical premiums. At a time of stagnant wages. It should be a surprise that it isn't higher than 46%!

It is almost always sourced as "tax filers" or "households" because the data comes from the IRS. I have even seen it mis-quoted as "all Americans" (which would ignore the fact that kids and older Americans tend not to pay income tax) and "wage earners" or "workers" (which it is not). Doesn't change your point, just wanted to clarify the stat.

Sal Sorce

10:22 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

He's using Obama's excuse by blaming other countries.
We are all very aware of how we have lost jobs in New Joisey.
it's been a bipartisan job to make living, running a business
in this Soprano State for many many many years ...
Both parties in Ocean County, but particularly those who
like Christie sell out to the big contributors on our environment
and by using jobs for building in open space and areas
that have had a negative impact on our lives ... try living
in some areas where property taxes for living on a lagoon
are insane ... NJ the best place to run from if we can sell?

Reply

Sal Sorce

10:24 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

As often said "actions speak louder than words"
Let's see how the municipalities get to go ahead with
tax cap increases ... loop holes abound.

Reply

Joe Fontombon

10:43 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Ahhhh... more teacher bashing! Please let me know where you got the figure for "average teacher" package in NJ $100,000.00. Fail statistics or ethics?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

12:03 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

OK, Joe, I'm game.
Fact (for clarification): MEDIAN - a value amongst a group of values of which there are an equal number of values above and below said value.
So, the median income for teachers in NJ, including benefits, comes to somewhere around $100,000. This is not to be confused with the average income. What is being said is that half of NJ teachers earn below that amount and half earn above that amount when benefits are factored in. Additionally, if we want to talk averages, according to the teacher-world.com website which bases its numbers on info from the NEA, NJ teachers' salaries were the filth highest in the nation for the 2009-2010 school year and $10,000 higher than the national average. (Additionally, I think it is only fair to discuss teacher's salaries including benefits, the biggest of which is the length of the work year as compared to the work year of everyone else.)
As for the source of the $100,000 number, it came from biggovernment.com's story titled "Union-Negotiated Sick Day Compensation System Under Fire in NJ."
BTW, full disclosure: as a professional employee of an international corporation, I have a benefit that compensates me for sick time that is pegged at 5-days per calendar year. More or less can be granted at a manager's discretion. Sick days do not carry over from year to year nor would I think it my right to use all 5 every year. It's a benefit to use if I get sick and for that I am grateful.

Comment_arrow

JB

10:13 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Sounds like you wish you could teach, Paul?

Ed B

10:49 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I can't get over the fact that this Bully can get away with his Antics. The idea to have Charter schools compete with public schools for state aid is so aggravating.
How can we just let this happen before our eyes...we vote & speak out but nobody listens....he has a school district in South Jersey accepting students from another district without paying to attend. The accepting school receives state aid to subsidize the added cost, the school can expell the student by Oct 15 or around that date & Keep all monies and does NOT have to reimburse the state or the district the student came from...am I missing something here...this is just unacceptable on Sooo many levels...

Reply

Thomas

11:11 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

"Will the last one to leave New Jersey, please turn out the lights"
Jim Gearhart (not sure if he originated the quote)
This has been a long-standing joke. It describes the phenomenon that has been happening in New Jersey for a long time. The tax system in this State is disproportionately hard on the middle class and even more so the working poor. The property tax system needs to be replaced. However, we should not do this until we fix the financial problem that is education. Education reform is the key to the whole crisis. Let us not make the mistake to let this be characterized as an attack on teachers; it is indeed a noble profession. We need to put the blame for the out of control costs and the substandard results squarely on the system itself. The system is overloaded with government at every level. What we need to do is to block grant every child, empowering parents to make the decision on where to send their child to school. Schools then compete for the students, offering the most creative and effective schooling for the lowest cost possible. Good old American competition. I have news for you; Teachers will be happier as well. They might have to trade in their pensions for a 401k match, but their day to day job will be more satisfying. They will no longer be stuck teaching in a broken system. I think most would take that trade. Not to mention they will no longer have to belong to a Te@chers Uni@n shhhh… someone might be watching…

Reply

Oscar Wilde

11:15 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100…

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7..

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do..

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.

Reply

Oscar Wilde

11:16 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got $10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joshua Berry

11:31 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I was just trying to google that email :o) Thanks for saving me the searching with Wiki dark for the day.

Oscar Wilde

11:17 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

11:44 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

You do know that income taxes are, right now, very low? At all levels. Significantly lower than they were under Reagan.

And corporate taxes are a joke because of loopholes.

Right?

Comment_arrow

suz

6:18 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Well said Oscar...seems most here do not realize that the "wealthy" are keeping this economy heads above water somewhat. Bottom line, if don't like Christie you will find fault in everything he does...if you do like him, you agree with his policies in trying to fix this state.

Comment_arrow

Jerry Grady

6:50 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

And the cow had no more milk to give. Thus the Rome Empire died and nodody could understand because they thought it was okay that the rich continue to pay for the poor

Ed B

11:27 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Teachers union Smeachers union...just there to collect the dues & arrange for the yearly getaway to Atlantic City...Forget the competition nonsense, teacher re-evaluation reform. There are retired Union delegates representing the teachers??Speaking about how they are not in favor of it & to work as a whole in a district to help acheive the goals. Seriously, I have had a front row seat on a session , it is very disturbing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Thomas

11:55 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

@ Ed B. You’re falling into the trap. You are putting the blame squarely onto the teachers. The opposition to freedom in the public schools will have you believe that proponents of freedom are bashing teachers. If I may speak for the side of freedom, I would say we are trying to liberate teachers and students from a failed system. There is no freedom in the current system. The teachers have almost no say as to what they can teach and the way it should be taught. Their time is divided by unfunded mandates and curriculum that distracts them from teaching the real skills children need to succeed in life. We need to liberate teachers and students from this failed system and allow them to be the best they can be in a free market system. The parent is the first teacher and the power needs to be placed into their hands once again. A free market solution would accomplish this.

Joe Fontombon

11:38 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Oscar: If they drink overseas, they'll be closer to the manufacturing plants of the corporations they've so patriotically invested in.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

1:03 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

That whole line about people moving oversees makes zero sense, and is totally make-believe. Anywhere a rich American would move to (and have the same standard / quality of life) would have significantly higher taxes. Sweden France and Japan aren't bargains. Bolivia has bad TV and lacks a Wegman's.

In America's GOLDEN AGE the top tax rate was 90%+ (Eisenhower) and lowered to something like 65% under JFK. It has been lowered ever since as the Baby Boomers demanded a cradle to grave decrease in taxes and increase in government benefits.

Suzanne Ziola Mazzuoccolo

11:50 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

<"Our economy suffers while Washington politicians – in both parties – fiddle. America’s position of strength and leadership around the world deteriorates while our leaders bicker and blame. Over the last two years New Jersey did the exact opposite. We achieved results because we did it together," Christie said.>
I do remember CC bickering and blaming since day one. Come on election day. I used to have children in my neighborhood scared because of what they heard this politician saying on tv. Out of the mouths of babes.

Reply

Sal Sorce

11:51 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

When so many have lost business and with operating
costs hitting record levels ... fuel, energy, fixed costs like
rental contracts what good is 10% on income ...
many that I have conferred with have dropped to minus 60-70%
in their business income ... sad very sad state with
any Governor so connected to the GOP political machine
and the wealthy high income sleaze bags in the party ...
Rino's if there ever were?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

12:47 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

What good is a 10% reduction in NJ state income tax, you ask, Sal? It's a start! NJ State income tax for me stands at about 2.1%. A 10% reduction lowers that to about 2.08%. You're right, it isn't much but, again, it's a start. You might remember, depending on your age, that tolls on the Walt Whitman Bridge were $1.20 ($0.60 each way). Now the cost is $5.00; that's over a 300% increase. Let's stop all the spurious spending of bridge tolls for things other than the bridge and maybe we can start lowering the tolls to some reasonable amount - a little at a time is better than not at all.

Pete Heinbaugh

12:35 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

"Tax Question: with 47% of wage earners paying no federal income tax, who then IS carrying the federal income tax burden?"

Few things that irk me more than this argument. The implication is that lower income earners are unfairly getting a free ride. This argument is either intellectually dishonest or nondiscerning. Here's why I say this...

First, Federal Income Tax is only one tax out of many taxes that we all are burdened with; and it is designed to be a progressive tax. Other types of tax - e.g.; sales tax, FICA /Medicare tax, property tax, state income tax, gas tax - most are regressive, some are flat, only NJ income tax is progressive.

Secondly, taxes paid are only one component of the truer measurement - financial net worth. When one looks at this measurement, one sees a trend that tilts steeply in favor of the top 1%. There are many sources for these stats, but the trend says that from around 1980 until present, that the percentage of wealth held by the top 1% has increased significantly, and that the percentage of wealth held by the bottom 80% has decreased significantly. So one should ask - How much worse would this trend be if the Federal Income Tax code was NOT what it is?

Here is my (admittedly lame) analogy....Stating that FIT is unfair to high income earners, and a free ride for low income earners is like Donald Trump (billionaire) claiming that it is unfair that Pete (thousand-aire, with a penny jar on the counter) has more pennies than him.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

1:06 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

And when you misuse the term "wage earners" it loads it all the more with that fake connotation.

But at least Paul is honest, and I respect that. He wants a tax increase on low and middle class Americans and a tax decrease on wealthy ones. That's what the flat tax is. We know this. He knows this. But you'll never hear a politician running for anything admit to that.

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

1:23 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Disclosure: I am not one of the so-called 1%. I have gone to school more than once and my income has thus outpaced the cost of living over the years. I am not jealous of what anyone on this blog is making. Fact: some people pay no federal income tax but usually gain from federal programs. Fact: all wage earners pay Social Security taxes because all partake in S.S. at retirement. Fact: life is unfair and there is no such thing as equality other than personal worth as a human being. So, all are created equal, but that does not create nor guarantee income equality. If we all start the work day with $100 at the end of the day there will be disparities. The only thing attempts at income equality will yield is ruination of the system. What happened on the Plymouth Plantation when the Pilgrims tried to live communally? If not for changing their charter to allow each to keep his own they would have starved.
I did not say lower income earners are getting a free ride unfairly, you used that term obviously in an attempt to denigrate my viewpoint, however, how much more can we tweak the numbers it before it will be totally unfair?
Unfortunately, the appetite of the federal government for revenue continues to grow and our 'representatives' will continue to come to the well until the well is completely dry. It's time for all of us to tighten our belts and live within our means. End the tax debacle that requires a 75,000 page tax code and go to a fair or flat tax.

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

1:24 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

At least I know what I know now, Porter, because you have been so kind to tell me. Lose the jealousy, it doesn't wear well.

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

1:53 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I was being serious. You don't like that 46% don't pay taxes (clearly stated in an earlier post), and are in favor of a system that would increase their liability - a flat tax that would (clearly stated in a later post).

"Allow everyone to get some skin in the game", remember?

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

2:12 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Jealous? Of what? This has taken a turn for the bizarre.

Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

3:13 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Actually, Porter, the fact that the 47% don't pay any federal income tax isn't what really bothers me. What really bothers me is the continuing call for raising taxes on those who are paying as if they're not paying enough already. The real question is that if 47% pay no federal income taxes and 5% pay 40% or more of the federal income tax burden and that is still not fair, then how much is fair? Would somebody, please, anybody, answer that question. How much is fair? Let's get it all out on the table so we can see how much those who already pay the lion's share should actually pay. If you (generically) are one of the ones paying nothing and Joe Somebody is one of the ones paying 35% of his income, how much more is fair?
You mention the Golden Age where income taxes for the wealthy were 90%+...do you really think it's fair that someone should work and turn over 90-cents or more of every dollar they earn to the government?

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

4:18 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Paul, the rationale for progressive taxation is that the wealthier you are the more of a stake you have in society and the bigger the benefit you reap from it.

I-295 is a great way for a guy to get to work, but it's invaluable to the guy who runs a supermarket chain or shipping company. Who's it worth more to?

The US Navy gives people peace of mind. It also is critical to economic realities like keeping oil prices from spiking (Iran with the straight of Hormuz). That's the difference between United Airlines making a profit and going out of business. Who benefits more from that?

I saw a story on how tech companies were relocating to SC because Clemson is belting out great high-tech workers. Now is the cost of maintaining a state university like that worth more to the people who own those companies, or the average person paying state taxes to support it?

A few examples, maybe bad ones, that illustrate the rationale.

And 90% was the top tax rate. We're now at 35% I believe. SO when people talk about the BS "Good Old Days" and why they're gone, I laugh. It's because people won't ask the rich to pay for them...the way they did back in the "Good Old Days". Most of the people against soaking the rich grew up in, and fondly remember, an America that did just that.

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

4:24 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Paul, and when we bail out the Financial and Auto industries...we clearly have a nation that covers the backsides of its truly wealthy.

Ed B

12:51 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Thomas ...I hear you, however,I'm not blaming teachers at all, there is teaching in a school district then there is teaching in the abbot districts, trying to reach a child who's cultural background differs from the norm in America, and understanding the parental involvemnet or lack thereof. Teaching to pass a test or teaching "the" test to acheive the "No child left behind" quotas. This is all of no benefit to anyone until there is teacher evaluation reform and a system that can reward the "good" teachers and weed out the "bad", tenured, looking to retire & not give a sh--- attitude types.
To allow the firing of those who do nothing to better their techniques in the classroom or to update themselves to modern times in the classroom. Grades are getting worse because you have school administrators in their 60's & 70's" still working!!!!!!!Go figure,
making well over $100,000.00 a year administrating their bank accounts, not caring about curricullum, students, teachers Yada yada yada

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Fontombon

1:07 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

"I'm not blaming teachers at all...." Right. And all the mudslinging that follows really helps your argument. I'd like to respect your opinion, but it's not worthy of it. Get off your high horse and volunteer in a school, or hospital, or food pantry. You remind me of the old Stevie Wonder song, "He's Mister Know-It-All."

Comment_arrow

Thomas

1:16 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Ed B, Now we are on the same page. Yes, Yes and Yes. It is the system which includes all of which you so artfully detailed. The answer to all this is a freedom. Freedom, like abstinence, works every time it is tried.

Comment_arrow

Ed B

2:00 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Hey Joe Christy...I am happy to say I do volunteer and what may appear as mudslinging to you is merely what I see

The Watcher

1:08 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

How much will senior citizens save if they only have social security benefits and a small pension totalling $25,000 to $35,000. They probably don't pay any tax now. Maybe the Governor should increase property tax rebates for them. That could help. And if there is no property tax involved, maybe a tax credit for rent paid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dajoepa75

6:39 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

You are right regarding income taxes for seniors. Social security is not taxable to the state and if you are 62 or older (or totally/permanently disabled) the first $15,000 of pension, IRA or nonearned income is deducted (for single, married separate) and $20,000 if married, joint or Head of Household) (as long as all income under $100,000). Add to that that single taxpayers with income under $10,000/year pay no state income tax and if married with income under $20,000 also pay no income tax. So this cut will do nothing for those in those income categories and seniors/disabled pay no tax if their nonearned income is offset by the exclusions allowed and the rest of their income is under $20,000 married, $10,000 single. As an example, 2011 tax tables show, a married couple with taxable income of $70,000, current tax rate is 1296. This will give them a $130 tax break; about $11.00 a month. Same couple $95,000 taxable income, taxes $2475, tax break of $248, $21.00 a month.

Porterincollingswood

1:14 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Here is the answer to all your questions...

http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/11/chart-of-the-day-1.html

PS - yeah, the congress is full of socialist commie czars. What a laugh!

Reply

Joshua Berry

1:18 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Ok people relax. This thread is getting a little too feisty and people are starting to lose perspective and take things personally.

Instead of focusing on what we do NOT agree on, can we try to focus on what we DO agree on? For example, our states tax structure is a train wreck across the income scale. Governors and Legislatures of both parties since the early 1990's have mismanaged our state finances and organizational structure to the point where our state is on the verge of collapsing onto itself like Greece did.

Many of you disagree with how Governor Christie is trying to fix the problem. I hear you and I get it. He is not going to please everyone and is going to piss people off.

What realistic ideas do you have to fix our state? Please don't suggest we just tax anyone with a job to pay for the broken promises and crushed dreams from past politicians. Assuming we could turn the other cheek on those who got us into this mess, how do you propose we move forward to fix it?

I won't attack you, I promise. I genuinely want to hear you thoughts. Even you disagree with mine. It is through the perspectives of others that we better ourselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul J. DiBartolo

1:30 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

A voice of sanity in the wilderness. Unfortunately, some only know one answer, tax the rich. I wish I were rich but am not, however, that does not keep many here from telling me that I want to tax the poor and let the rich slide. They know me better than I know myself. Good luck, Josh. You, of all people, know what I am saying. I agree though, never give up, if maybe, perchance, you can bring one individual to sanity. If not for that I would have quit long ago.

Comment_arrow

Porterincollingswood

2:04 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Josh, what I have seen from NJ is this - people do not want to do without ANYTHING they've grown accustomed to having, and they don't want to pay for it in the form of higher taxes.

The bill is due for years of mismanagement going way back. Not paying it merely delays the inevitable. Doesn't matter who's party did it, doesn't matter if you are young or old, are a long-time resident or a new one.

That's why you don't hear solutions, you mainly only hear complaining.

I'd love to see a sports book, but how far is that going to get you? A drop in the bucket, probably only enough to stabilize AC.

I'd love to see shared services between boroughs, and maybe on a county level - and that's happening. But people want local control at the end of the day. They want their own police and fire departments.

And I think it's only fair to have a tax based on what people can pay (income) as opposed to what they own (property tax).

Comment_arrow

Ed B

2:38 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Your right Josh, unfortunately this is as far as it gets...we get pissed off and nothing changes...You can Occupy Trenton, Washington, and all parts in between, but we need to fix our broken system, and the pool of people we have to pick from to help fix it are associated with the ones who broke it somehow or another...its a viscious cycle and we have to break it sometime, somewhere, somehow.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

10:25 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012

Bottom line is the Gov. has made many changes regarding public employees and the state's finances which on paper would lower EVERYONE'S PROPERTY TAX BILLS!!! However those savings HAVE NOT trickled to our property tax bills. My property tax bills continue to rise by hundreds of dollars every year. Where are these supposed savings going to ?????? That's the $64,000 question........

Sal Sorce

2:06 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Christie would never admit New Joisey is a welfare state ...
back many years ago ... 40+ folks who migrated here to work
to farms figured out it was best to go on welfare and the dole ...
both parties have pandered to the wealthy developers and
the socialist minded who believe the government owes them
salaries, benefits and of course healthcare while watching
OPRA channel ... sounds bias, it's not it's a fact.
Folks of our inner cities have been trapped by a system that
has leaned to the extreme LEFT and social beliefs - rules.
Too bad the English back in the 16th Century figured out
they could tax for roads (among everything else).
I thought we withdrew from merry old England???

Reply

Jay Mill

3:26 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Reducing taxes is welcomed by all; however, given that NJ has the highest property taxes nationwide, why don't we focus on reducing property taxes first especially in light of the fact that home values have been falling while tax rates continue to creep higher? A proposal in this regard would do a lot more to spark a housing rebound and add much needed jobs to the economy...and, as we know, more jobs typically adds more tax revenue!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Schu

4:26 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

I see the Democratic Legislature focusing on Gay Marriage Bill as their top priority not property tax reform. Some of these clowns in Trenton have been there for years and they talk a good game about property tax reform to help the middle class but they won't do what it takes to fix the system they design to keep taxpayers money in their districts.

Oscar Wilde

4:32 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Property taxes are the most REGRESSIVE tax in the world and yet the progressive DemocRATS and lying RepubliCANTS both protect that and the staus quo

Reply
Comment_arrow

Skizma

6:40 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

so far, you are the only one who's got it right. Property taxes are totally inequitable. The guy who owns the 3 mil home and only pays 20 grand in property taxes, maybe 30 makes out GREAT compared to what he could be paying in income taxes. While the average homeowner pays 6500 for a 350,000 home. Do the math folks. If all were equitable, the 3 mil home taxes should be.......55,000. Nope. All those lovely oceanfront homes don't come close. Now there is where we could find some extra dough to pay for things. Have all the RE taxes go to a general fund, by which schools and towns are paid for. Anything extra the taxpayers pay for, equitably by a town tax. But nope. Not how it works. The wealthy DEMs as well are just a selfish. Sorry DEM's but you guys always spout about the wealthy as if they are all REP's. LOOK at the income of your senators, US rep's....equally balanced between REP and DEM;s. BOTH are filthy rich and out to protect each other. Duhhhhhhhh........

Jim

4:53 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Eliminate income taxes altogether. This government is corrupt to its very core. Ron Paul 2012.

Reply

FbS

6:18 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Chris Cristie for president.. Id vote for him in a minute. Everyone wants changes and he has made the only positive changes in years for our state. Next is the US...Remember folks, positive changes are sometimes painful for a short period. But we will all benefit in the end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

.

6:47 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

Name a few positive things that this loudmouth has done for New Jersey. I bet you can't count on one hand. Also, if you plan on voting for him, you really should how to spell his name.

BP

6:32 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

New Jersey can start to heal and grow when corrupt and arrogant, union-backed Democrats are forced out of office. The poster boys for everything wrong with this country and this state are the twin failures: Obama and Corzine

Reply

Jerry Grady

6:41 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Glad to see my fellow friends are having the same arguments in NJ that my peers in MI have. Mr. Snyder has done to MI what Mr. Christie has done for NJ, made it a shining star in light of all the BS our federal guys do. Both of these men have done what needed to be done, hold everyone accountable, make sure we increase the overall growth of the state by making it attractive for business to come to the state. If people would just take a moment and understand how Rome failed you will learn that you can only live off the milk of the cow until the cow dries up. Does everyone really believe the current systems work. No, the numbers could not stand 20 years ago when people believed they should be given pensions and health care for life. But again everyone wants to be taken care of by someone else, and we know where that got Rome. Great job Mr. Christie, you make me proud to have my summer home in your state as you have protected my investment and my kids future. (as a side note do any of you know the common thread in the top 10 poorest cities for the past 25 years)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrs. G.

12:42 pm on Sunday, March 11, 2012

Jerry - the NJ comeback is a joke. Have you checked your property value lately? Have you noticed that the country has an 8.3% unemployment rate while NJ has a 9% rate? Have you gotten your property tax bill for the year - seen any relief? Our loudmouth governor makes me hide my head in shame - he does not represent all of NJ.

Anthony Ruiz

11:26 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Don't fool yourselves. This 10% tax cut is not coming for you and me. Christie is pandering to the very well-off. That tax cut is coming in lay-offs and fees that only the middle classs pays for. Like when he was elected and promised no new taxes, however, every NJ commuter saw a 25-30% increase in their monthly ticket costs. Do the math. New Jersey has a 9.1% unemployment rate, which means less money going to the treasury and more benefit spending to help the unemployed survive. Add to that the financial analysts are expecting a rough 2012. Now is not the time to cut taxes and reduce revenue to our state treasury. He's using our future, to support his future for higher office.

Reply

Anthony Ruiz

11:49 pm on Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Blood was spent by our forefathers to obtain freedom. Taxes are the price we pay to maintain it. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it. An interesting history lesson on US Taxes by a conservative financial website. http://www.businessinsider.com/history-of-tax-rates

Reply
Comment_arrow

Winston

11:58 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012

Anthony enough of the Democrat "reelect Obama" talking points. The link you posted is to a left wing Democrat supporter and loon. Face the facts lower taxes solve two BIG problems = more money for people to spend and less money for policians to waste.

sick of taxes

12:55 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

frank schureman which positive change has christie given us? a 50% tax hike just to get to work? the price of everything delivered by truck including gas skyrocketing because of that alone. the $400 million dollar mistakes filling out a form/ the riding the tea cup ride in disneyworld while nj was crippled for a week by the dec 26th blizzard/ the helicopter rides to junior's game and vowing to veto any 3% tax hike on millionaires. ? frankie you remind me of that movie "invasion of the body snatchers" pod people trying to convince normal people to become pod people too.

Reply

FbS

7:08 am on Thursday, January 19, 2012

dramatic changes in public employee pension and health benefits, education reform, the approval of 23 new charter schools, stood up to the unions, reforms designed to curb property tax costs, eliminated the costly auto inspection policy.. That filled up my hand :)

Reply

Portia

8:43 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012

"capping property tax increases" - Clearly, Governor Christie does not live in Brick!

Reply

disgusted homeowner

10:11 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012

The purpose of the Corzine toll hike was to fund the building of the new tunnel project to New York. Since Gov. Christie cancelled the project entirely, one would think a TOLL HIKE ROLLBACK would be appropriate. How about it Gov????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joshua Berry

10:51 am on Sunday, January 22, 2012

One of my lessons tilting at windmills at the local livel is the only real remedy citizens have to redress against government abuse is the court system. Why not find a lawyer looking for some publicity and sue the Turnpike Authority (or whatever that are called)?

Joe

6:04 pm on Monday, January 23, 2012

It's Christie Whitman reincarnated as a man!

Reply

Donald J Borst

5:02 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Politics is the profession to be in today. They all make out like bandits and write their own tickets, behind closed doors. The taxpayers get to vote on nothing that affects them. They make bunches of promises that they know they are unable to keep. Christie knew of the new 1/1/2012 turnpike and GSP toll increases on the books from LOSER Corzine and did NOTHING to stop or reduce them. They all continue to spend more than they take in. The taxpayer is the victim and the bottomless pit. So they think.

Reply

Spooner

5:40 pm on Tuesday, January 24, 2012

...they Christie and the Democrats just eliminated voting on school budgets. . . that was required by law. . .the best part of the bill is the introduction: "Reform Measure Will Allow Voters to Take Control of Local Finances, Save Money" What double talk!

Reply

Donald J Borst

3:05 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012

I take heart in the fact that the majority the respondents feel as I do.Christie is just another POLITICIAN. They can all dish out a bunch of hollow promises and not have to fulfill a one of them, They are all cut from the same mold, The only people who matter to them are themselves. They will promise anything to protect their sweet little positions and power. When was the last time any of them mentioned their costituency? It seems to be a dirty word to them. Just remember all of the liars at election time folks. Thank you all.

Reply

Mr. ?

4:16 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012

Christie reform education?... you mean be putting partisan political control in schools, by allowing take over with November elections? Thereby raising taxes through pay to play (not kids sports) when giving out those lucrative professional contracts? You mean allowing school budgets under the 2% cap to be automatically approved with out any vote. Oh, that will save taxes! Not! Citizens who believe that are idiots. Your taxes will go up drastically! First the automatic 2% plus all the bonding debt service, emergency appropriations, health and pension obligations maybe another 3%. You will be lucking to escape Christie's call for lower taxes with that 5% or more increase. Puke! Gag! First post here...will leave now....please turn off the lights .

Reply

Beachy Keen

4:46 pm on Thursday, January 26, 2012

@Donald, I don't know if I would say that I take heart in that others are as disgusted as I am but I wonder why most on here seem to think the same but yet this continues to go on as if money is washing up on the beaches. You are correct, they are all liars and we can't trust them especially Christie.

Reply

Leave a comment